WorkVictor Cousin

Cours de l'histoire de la philosophie

Cours de l'histoire de la philosophie, Vol. II; Elements of Psychology (inferred)

InferredFuller advises Richard that he should have read Cousin's "Introduction" rather than "Cousin on Locke." Hudspeth identified Victor Cousin's lectures on Locke were published as Vol. 2 of *Cours de l'histoire de la philosophie* (Paris, 1829), with Caleb S.

AnalyzedReadMentioned

Documented 1842

Letters

Selected engagements, in chronological order.

Totals count documented engagements, once at the earliest witness. How we count →

Reprints, Memoirs passages, and repeat notes within a single manuscript are shown but never counted twice. Evidence for this work is selective, not exhaustive. Methodology →

When Fuller engaged with this work

I. Childhood

II. Adolescence

III. Self-Directed

IV. Transcendentalist1record

V. New York

VI. Europe

✦. Memoirs (1852)

1810

1820

1832

1836

1844

1846

1850

1842—

Letter to Richard F. Fuller

p86

analyzed · read

“You should not have tried Cousin on Locke but his Introduction”

Fuller, Margaret. The Letters of Margaret Fuller. Edited by Robert N. Hudspeth. Vol. III. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986.

Inferred Fuller advises Richard that he should have read Cousin's "Introduction" rather than "Cousin on Locke." Hudspeth identified Victor Cousin's lectures on Locke were published as Vol. 2 of Cours de l'histoire de la philosophie (Paris, 1829), with Caleb S.