WorkGeorge Ripley

Reply to Norton's Remarks on Spinoza: A Second Letter

Reply to Norton's Remarks on Spinoza: A Second Letter (Boston: James Munroe, 1840) Inferred

George Ripley (1802–1880) · Boston: James Munroe, 1840

InferredFuller references Ripley's defense of Spinoza in his pamphlet controversy with Andrews Norton, employing a light tone ("fighting the battles of Spinoza and other infidels") that suggests her familiarity with the dispute; as Hudspeth identified.

ReadMentioned

Documented 1840

Letters

Selected engagements, in chronological order.

Totals count documented engagements, once at the earliest witness. How we count →

Reprints, Memoirs passages, and repeat notes within a single manuscript are shown but never counted twice. Evidence for this work is selective, not exhaustive. Methodology →

When Fuller engaged with this work

I. Childhood
II. Adolescence
III. Self-Directed
IV. Transcendentalist1record
V. New York
VI. Europe
✦. Memoirs (1852)
1810
1820
1832
1836
1844
1846
1850
1840—

Letter to Frederic H. Hedge

p113
read
“Mr Ripley would have written you a better, but he is too busy fighting the battles of Spinoza and other infidels.”

Fuller, Margaret. The Letters of Margaret Fuller. Edited by Robert N. Hudspeth. Vol. II. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.

Inferred Fuller references Ripley's defense of Spinoza in his pamphlet controversy with Andrews Norton, employing a light tone ("fighting the battles of Spinoza and other infidels") that suggests her familiarity with the dispute; as Hudspeth identified.